DailyMarkets.com - Antipiracy Bills Delayed In Congress

Antipiracy Bills Delayed In Congress
Why Does Obama Want The U.S. To Be Energy Poor?
Nat Gas: A Foundational Fuel For The Economy With A Surplus That Will Keep Prices Low For Years
Frack Away, There’s No Reason Not To, Even Though It’s Not The “Government’s Energy”

Posted: 21 Jan 2012 07:00 AM PST

01/21/12 The cyberwar over SOPA and PIPA heated up this week, with the two bills being postponed in the aftermath of the midweek internet protest and Megaupload … [visit site to read more] or compare Credit Card Rewards and Best Credit Cards

Why Does Obama Want The U.S. To Be Energy Poor?

Posted: 21 Jan 2012 06:39 AM PST

From Thomas J. Pyle, President and CEO of the American Energy Alliance:

“One of the reasons the unemployment rate has been stuck above 8 percent for years is because the Obama administration is actively blocking the private sector from creating jobs. Approving the Keystone XL pipeline, now in its third year of review, would have gone a long way toward boosting American job creation and strengthening our energy security. But the President prefers the politics of energy poverty and has sided … [visit site to read more] or compare Credit Card Rewards and Best Credit Cards

Nat Gas: A Foundational Fuel For The Economy With A Surplus That Will Keep Prices Low For Years

Posted: 21 Jan 2012 06:06 AM PST

Charlotte Observer — “Craig Schwartz’s heating bill tells the story of a natural gas industry upheaval that’s rippling through North Carolina. First, take a look at Schwartz’s natural gas bill for December: $73.69. Then look at December 2010, just a year before. The Raleigh computer scientist paid nearly twice as much: $134.14. Now spread those numbers out over several months, and quite likely years.

“That’s huge,” Schwartz said. “I’ll take $200 to $300 bucks a year in natural gas … [visit site to read more] or compare Credit Card Rewards and Best Credit Cards

Frack Away, There’s No Reason Not To, Even Though It’s Not The “Government’s Energy”

Posted: 21 Jan 2012 05:58 AM PST

New Scientist — “Frack away, there’s no reason not to. Two of the main objections to “fracking” for shale gas have been blown out of proportion, according to British geologists.

“We think the risk is pretty low,” said Mike Stephenson, head of energy science at the British Geological Survey at a press briefing in London on Tuesday of this week.”

See other reports here from BBC News, Wired UK and the Free Republic, where John Ranson writes:

“As George Will noted at the beginning of the … [visit site to read more] or compare Credit Card Rewards and Best Credit Cards